The
situation in Iraq is problematic for the coalition forces, as well as
for the Iraqi Government. The conflict and instability in Iraq is a
political liability for the coalition governments. Years after the
coalition invasion, Iraq is very unstable. Minority groups can be at
more significant risk when there is political, or economic
instability.
Reports
of human rights abuses and violence targeting sexual minorities is a
real concern in Iraq. Some of the stories coming from Iraq are deeply
disturbing to read. The headline of an article on the Pink
News web site states Iraq is the most dangerous place on the
earth for gay people. According to the author, Iraq is even more
dangerous than Iran. The article makes reference to “hundreds” of
gay, lesbian, and trans-identified people being hunted down and
killed. We gather physicians have confirmed cases of gay men who had
their anuses glued shut by members of the militia. Sexual minorities
attempting to seek refugee status in the United Kingdom have had
difficultly doing that.
An
Amnesty
International report provides additional insight into the
situation in Iraq. According to the Amnesty
International report, clerics have encouraged people to attack
people suspected of being homosexual. Unfortunately, the violence
targets more than sexual minorities. Religious and ethnic minorities,
women, and girls appear to be most highly at risk.
*
* *
Canadian
Time
magazine
for August
30, 2010 carries the bold title “Is America Islamophobic?” The
question is important to answer in light of the very strong reactions
against a plan to build an Islamic center and mosque within a few
blocks of the World Trade Center, where a terrorist attack by
extremists Muslims resulted in the death of about 3,000 people. This
commentary will trampoline off the title “Is America Islamophobic?”
Opinions expressed in the commentary are not presented in the Time
article.
Traumatizing
wounds, and resentments caused by old wars last a long time. Tensions
between ethnic groups in the former Yugoslavia have a long history. A
case can be made that there are a few north-south tensions remaining
over 150 years after the American Civil War ended.
The
wounds of the American war on terrorism remain. And those wounds are
deep. Video clips of the Towers on fire and of people jumping from
the Towers to their death are engraved in the minds of Americans.
Just as many Americans can tell you exactly where they were when
President Kennedy was shot, many Americans can tell you exactly where
they were when they learned of the terrorist attack on the World
Trade Center.
The
terrorist acts that destroyed the World Trade Center showed Americans
that they were vulnerable to terrorism. The United States wanted to
bring those guilty to justice. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were
justified as part of a war on terrorism. Every week, American
soldiers die in the ongoing wars on terrorism. The constant loss of
life helps keep the wounds very fresh. Unfortunately, some Americans
blame the deaths of young American soldiers on Islamic people.
In
a climate of such fear and deep hurt, comes a proposal to build an
Islamic cultural center and mosque a few blocks from where the World
Trade Center was located. Plans to build an Islamic center so close
to Ground Zero might have been naively insensitive. While the plan
was not palatable to many average Americans, the plan was not
evil.
Fear
of more terrorism and of the unknown causes some people to respond to
neutral events with anger. The resulting anti-Islamic anger could be
making American feel unsafe to some patriotic Islamic Americans. Just
as a few Islamic terrorists used religion to support their political
aims, some American political and religious leaders are using
religion to support their political aims. Fear can mobilize a sizable
body of political party volunteers, as well as attract voters to
candidates they feel will ensure they are safe. The current tensions
are likely to result in unscrupulous political leaders lashing out at
Islamic Americans in an attempt to attract frightened voters.
Conservative political and religious leaders used fear of gay people
to justify opposing gay human rights, and protection of gay people in
hate crimes legislation. Oppression of minority groups is a formula
that has proven politically popular and expedient for generations.
Are
Americans Islamophobic? The simple answer is “yes.”
Unfortunately, bad questions often give us faulty answers. A better
question is, “Are people afraid of the unknown?” Fear of the
unknown is a universal. The question those of us who oppose hate
crimes need to ponder is, “How can we we reduce fear?”
Islamphobia will cause some Islamic Americans into the closet. When
Islam is closeted, distortions of Islam can easily be promoted, and
the climate of fear increases. At a time when Americans most need to
dialogue with Muslims, closet doors will prevent honest and open
sharing.
The
reality is moderate and liberal Islamic Americans probably have far
more to fear from radical, extremist Islam than Christian or Jewish
Americans. They have to fear hate, prejudice, and discrimination from
outside and inside Islam.
*
* *
Bilerico
carries the story of Abdollahi, a young gay man. We gather he has
been in the United States for twenty years. He faces being deported
to Iran, where he could be executed for being gay.
*
* *
The
Presbyterian church, USA, at its General Assembly, voted to allow gay
clergy to have partners. Previously, gay pastors were required to be
celibate. Evidently, the decision must be ratified by the member
presbyteries. An article about the vote can be read on 365gay.com.